Re: [Pce] Adoptingdraft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document ?

Hi Meral,

I'm not sure that you are applying the term "optimization" consistently. 
BRPC optimizes the placement of a single end-to-end LSP that crosses 
multiple domains. GCO optimizes a "network", that is a set of LSPs within a 
single domain.

But, anyway, if you think some form of cross-reference would be valuable, 
can you please suggest some text to the GCO authors for inclusion in their 
I-D.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Meral Shirazipour" <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>
To: "JP Vasseur" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Cc: <pce@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Pce] 
Adoptingdraft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document 
?

> Hi,
>  Thank you for the answer. But I still think any optimization application 
> draft
> should refer to the others, even if it is only one sentence to say that 
> there
> are no dependencies. Also, since each optimization application draft will
> probably propose similar extensions to PCEP, it would be better, at least 
> from
> an implementation point of view, to generalize these extensions instead of
> making them application specific.
>
> Cordially,
> Meral
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Selon JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>:
>
>> Hi Meral,
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > I would support this draft based on its content, but I only see one
>> > problem: it
>> > does not consider or even refer to draft-ietf-pce-brpc-04.txt (or
>> > maybe I
>> > missed it?).
>> > I would rather see a single draft covering all possible optimization
>> > scenarios/solutions based on the PCE architecture.
>> >
>>
>> BRPC is a multi-PCE path computation technique used to compute a
>> shortest constrained
>> inter-domain path wheres this ID specifies a (preferably) NMS based
>> technique where a
>> set of path computation requests are bundled and send to a PCE with
>> the objective of
>> "optimizing" the set of computed paths.
>>
>> > Having several IDs for optimization applications is ok as long as
>> > they refer to
>> > each other and maybe provide an <inter-working> section between the
>> > different
>> > methods.
>>
>> There is no real reason for referring to each other since there is no
>> dependency.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> JP.
>>
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> > Meral
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Selon JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>:
>> >
>> >> Dear WG,
>> >>
>> >> Do you support the adoption of draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-
>> >> optimization-04.txt as a Working Group document ?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> JP.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pce mailing list
>> >> Pce@lists.ietf.org
>> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce