Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 03 April 2021 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657D83A1AD6; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 22:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLcr6yL3yj0A; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 22:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583763A1AD4; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 22:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id gv19-20020a17090b11d3b029014c516f4eb5so1617861pjb.0; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 22:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MMjMh5MAB4Baxi5CnrjgCaC1fuPX5M6ifFrwfUAF5io=; b=PVcprpiaDdrZPD6rEU2+9CYi3pucy/230KrlOL4A4qs6QzDabuzUrtWMuga4nrIlxK ohcbTNg9BGRN6wPaOa/G3B+faTCHz+X0XWp7P8qAUNAfuSyTSi5H+cG7DCAijds3YmwX tTJrUWQTWR6ytjLNgj2Y1zlgKaoEIUa/3WOpzFDwdzkqKUYEsjWEripJb02GmRWGxD7I 3BWLGPr4eCiFvb7XTsFlOkam98H+zK1vg7NNbU85XBYhURQrY77wdBLlnknXqQQEnJzr 0biF7S3nD/6KgSzuIwOUyAf8UPksppxz1J9aawKxCZkA78gkrPPMr8hZP68wTN6J+wOT F0yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MMjMh5MAB4Baxi5CnrjgCaC1fuPX5M6ifFrwfUAF5io=; b=n3bjyRLO0BfypXO49kMu/OyDKyyrkrB3bBFhAx8j6VeLDVkStMOAjhCzs3laEE0S2t jjA5UxErRi223heSCV/LFDmd1UWV0I90yzzUevNxrVN5JKOuODDqaPAsRu3hEhYlYSNo 7QjagMPK+vveivKAZcG1k2e8X5HLqCEoV1DyXyuFz+RADR9NL2/1xZD0U3q304IbFU53 aS1kg9zPX/xBYXri3GiLkToG3AYFAKftZO6PTHWWvoWZh7Bo95Ju8r/XIAaMg0LL3L5R 1j8zV3B/VnRASJUCe41ce3Z/dW5xxewApjD+eI7CdEVhkQ3QepNOkRJ1GHIE6hNEa0mJ iEiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M3op04ozqz0f1VJ6eGnIfkBy0ABI6WF+IkmcIDis8fHPyBtol TlE4eVhcmI+QEoLHDxs9OK0mNPeIYeF5taa5RLM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSiWuzms+Znx+sIWDE4OFNPKBeee3rfoJsXEEzH5YI28/iLZsr5fEJcKQ5qTXjv6K6l6Ob308wlCcwpzBZZCY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d2c5:b029:e5:c9ce:cb3c with SMTP id n5-20020a170902d2c5b02900e5c9cecb3cmr15765619plc.74.1617426019811; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 22:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <64B123AD47B4514BA507B0376760B284017793E65B@MAIL-MBX-05>
In-Reply-To: <64B123AD47B4514BA507B0376760B284017793E65B@MAIL-MBX-05>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 01:00:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2XtR1en2zecA41ohkx79kVr7kzG9rHZ+BcMRKchCJ1UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?67CV7LaY6rG4KE5hYXMgVHJhbnNmb3JtYXRpb24g7YyAKQ==?= <peter.park@kt.com>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org" <draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c844505bf0a57db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ToqPP-UEpvXlOJGPlk4nv2PFZ_s>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:00:26 -0000

Hi Peter

That’s good to hear interest from operators such as yourself in PCEP-LS.
As you deploy PCECC and H-PCE in a multi domain environments you will be
able to reuse the SBI PCEP session for PCEP-LS and then can take full
advantage of some of benefits of PCEP-LS such as synchronization
optimization and incremental updates.

Thank you for sharing your interest in PCEP-LS.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:14 PM 박춘걸(Naas Transformation 팀) <peter.park@kt.com>
wrote:

> Dear Gyan,
>
>
>
> As a telco, we are interested in the upgrade of PCEP.
>
> PCEP and H-PCE scenarios is always being considered as valuable tools for
> solving our issues in telco’s multi-domain environment.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:36 AM
> *To:* pce@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <
> dd@dhruvdhody.com>gt;; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> *Subject:* [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
>
>
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
>
>
> We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap
> and a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE
> were highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused.
>
>
>
> This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and
> development efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing
> mechanisms. There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of
> PCEP sessions for this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it
> may not be useful to rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite
> protocol :). What would be useful would be - finding out if there is still
> interest in this experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong
> technical objections for the experiment in its limited scope etc...
>
>
>
> As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments
> and expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well
> as impact in other protocols and the network, etc.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gyan (on behalf of co-authors)
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
>
> ==
>
>
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에
> 포함된 정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못
> 전송된 경우, 발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다.
> This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
> material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you
> receive this email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing,
> distributing or retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately.
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*