Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hi Shuping,

Many thanks for your comments! We have updated the document to address them. Please check the diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-12

Thanks again for your comments!
Cheng

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 4:04 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy@ietf.org; pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hi,

I have read this draft, and I support this document being published as an RFC.

Just a few nits are found and listed as below.

1. "may instantiate LSPs and specifies" -> "...specify"
2. "[RFC8697] specify" -> "... specifies"
3. "Error- Value 4" -> "Error-Value 4"
4. " In some cases to apply a PCE policy successfully, it is required to also associate some policy parameters that needs to be evaluated, to successfully apply the said policy. " 
-> " In some cases to apply a PCE policy successfully, it is required to also associate some policy parameters that need to be evaluated. "
5. "The TLV could include one or more policy related parameter" -> "... parameters"
6. "a 4-bytes alignment" -> "4-byte"
7. "The PCEP peer implementation need to be aware" 
->" The PCEP peer implementation needs to be aware"
8. "Further, if one or more parameters received in the POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV received by the PCEP speaker "
-> "Further, if one or more parameters in the POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV received by the PCEP speaker "
9. " IANA is requested to confirm the early-allocated codepoints "
-> " IANA is requested to confirm the early-allocated code point" 
10. "in which case the an operator MUST "
-> " in which case the operator MUST "
11. "This module supports associations as defined in [RFC8697] and thus support the Policy Association groups "
-> "This module supports associations as defined in [RFC8697] and thus supports the Policy Association groups "
12. " this document borrow some of " -> " this document borrowed some of "

Best regards,
Shuping

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy@ietf.org; pce-chairs 
> <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> This email starts a working group last call for 
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1].  Please indicate your support 
> or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of 
> the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, 
> please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready 
> for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
> 
> The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dhruv & Julien
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce