[Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 20 January 2021 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9613A0B54; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:52:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161112914381.1787.15786067723940959145@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:52:23 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/n5sA3CBYEyUVWLwmMCcAZxGLnig>
Subject: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 07:52:24 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The use of BCP 14 language in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 seems awkward, since it
appears to be discussing operator-facing features of an implementation rather
than interoperability concerns.  See, in particular, Section 6 of RFC 2119.