Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11

Hi Greg，

Thank you very much for your support and comments. 
Please see inline....

Best Regards,
Ran

Original

From: GregMirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>;pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org <draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年10月05日 15:55
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Dear All,I've read the draft and support its adoption by the PCE WG. A couple notes for future consideration:
Adrian earlier noted the number of names on the front page. Although the five is not a hard stop, it seems like conforming to the recommendation could be a wise approach.
[Ran]: Okay, the next version will retain five authors.

TE as Tree Engineering is used in the document is hard to distinguish from more used at IETF expansion of the acronym, Traffic engineering. Hence, several questions:

In your view, is Tree Engineering close to the Path Engineering, i.e., defining an explicit path, or it also includes the resource allocation and thus is closer to the true Traffic Engineering?

Assuming it is the former, could using the Path Engineering be acceptable?

If it is the latter, could TE in the draft be expanded as Traffic Engineering?

[Ran]: Follows the definition in RFC9262 (Tree Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER-TE) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9262/  ). In the definition of terms section, for BIER-TE, would it be more clear if I quoted RFC9262?

Regards,

Greg

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:36 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

I support WG adoption.

Thanks 

Gyan

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:50 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

_______________________________________________
 Pce mailing list
 Pce@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
 Pce mailing list
 Pce@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce