Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net> Mon, 19 April 2021 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hsyu@cfiec.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C413A1894 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.27
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=1.167, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPfz-aKae2Mi for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgau2.qq.com (smtpbgau2.qq.com [54.206.34.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 514923A1891 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp22t1618798200tuh7piwc
Received: from DESKTOP-3U2VLEE (unknown [121.69.40.129]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id 0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:09:53 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 0040000000400090B000B00A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: 67rUI+SwxC2A1u/O79tnzDxQ6fBXD6pT33MDpJxxwjr8EiXE88cs9bBqp/Lfh oh2xqMd/4++Ozr2K86dUPHY83J4XL+m6xa2bn++eMny6jeRVxtykapOJBWmgTjOdEODKUiH fmTOhcZ/toRnKUcu7wA4dmBOcy9h5oVPTSjWMc8oS5TKHKY4sCa/AzLcNE8tDnBznwd1PnH P3eGw7q+BzPpYLnTVrZMYtCXoSIRl2w3CUoPLG2yAWb0h06zY6NBcsJDjFr4vSK6O400a9c kXkPJoIJud8PFkUNEbrKNSOMxxqPle6b+gSmwMdMobIvpbtUQnEzEIZz89xlsFegPYcQHa3 MlD2VM1AlKFwrmxrRugIpQoIrr54A==
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:09:52 +0800
From: hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net>
To: =?utf-8?Q?pce=40ietf.org?= <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <6253DED3-72FB-416B-ABD4-44D9072E2078@cfiec.net>+48E0BCC89421E44D
In-Reply-To: <93D82731-7B33-4E39-8DEF-FF6C14803191@gmail.com>
References: <93D82731-7B33-4E39-8DEF-FF6C14803191@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MailMasterPC/4.15.2.1005 (Windows 10 19H2)
X-CUSTOM-MAIL-MASTER-SENT-ID: 2BD35B36-E6E7-435B-A05B-B5DD4E8BB8C7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cfiec.net:qybgforeign:qybgforeign7
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tMxdqo2zw0uLqI6hnbnwvAh22PY>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 02:10:13 -0000

Hi, all

    I support the WG adoption of this draft. It is very interesting to achieve dynamic centralized control without the need for local configuration on the PCC.
    
    Best regards.

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Sat, 17 April 2021 02:20 UTChttps://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/9tINBbj2J5AIzOAVt-ypgXmX_00/#" rel="nofollow">Show header

Hi all,
 
    I support WG adoption of this draft.

    It is a valuable job to support multipath in the PCEP.
 
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com
 
From: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Date: 2021-04-16 09:48
To: Dhruv Dhody; pce@ietf.org
CC: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG, 
 
I support WG adoption of this draft since it is an important work that fills in the gap of multipath support in PCEP. 
 
Thank you for your help on progressing this work! 
 
Best regards, 
Shuping 
 
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
 
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. 
 
Please respond by Wednesday 28th April.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien