Re: [PCN] PCN edge behaviour experiment

[Michael Menth <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ruediger, hi Tom!

Ruediger, you are right. The text should be

"the aggregate rate of admitted flows on some links should come
close to the *admissible rates* of these links."

Regards,

     Michael

Am 21.03.2012 08:25, schrieb [e-mail]:
> Hi Tom, hi Michael
>
> "network running near capacity" is correct if complete links transmit
> PCN traffic only. Otherwise, "PCN network capacities running near
> congestion (on at least one interface)" is better. That may also
> simplify experiments, dedicated tunnels in a live network with
> proper marking may suffice.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ruediger
>
>
> Tom:
>> This document describes an experimental edge node behaviour to
>> implement PCN in a network. The experiment may be run in a network in
>> which a substantial proportion of the traffic carried is in the form
>> of inelastic flows and where admission control of micro-flows is
>> applied at the edge. For the effects of PCN to be observable, at least
>> some links of the network should be running near or at capacity.
> Michael:
> Better: "the aggregate rate of admitted flows on some links should come
> close to the bandwidths of these links."
>

-- 
Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
University of Tuebingen
Faculty of Science
Department of Computer Science
Chair of Communication Networks
Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]
http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de