Re: [PCN] PCN edge behaviour experiment

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

I did rework the wording to capture Ruediger's sense. Michael, your 
wording assumes that PCN is already running on the network, where in 
this case one is examining a network as a prospect for a PCN experiment.

On 21/03/2012 4:11 AM, Michael Menth wrote:
> Hi Ruediger, hi Tom!
>
> Ruediger, you are right. The text should be
>
> "the aggregate rate of admitted flows on some links should come
> close to the *admissible rates* of these links."
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Am 21.03.2012 08:25, schrieb [e-mail]:
>> Hi Tom, hi Michael
>>
>> "network running near capacity" is correct if complete links transmit
>> PCN traffic only. Otherwise, "PCN network capacities running near
>> congestion (on at least one interface)" is better. That may also
>> simplify experiments, dedicated tunnels in a live network with
>> proper marking may suffice.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ruediger
>>
>>
>> Tom:
>>> This document describes an experimental edge node behaviour to
>>> implement PCN in a network. The experiment may be run in a network in
>>> which a substantial proportion of the traffic carried is in the form
>>> of inelastic flows and where admission control of micro-flows is
>>> applied at the edge. For the effects of PCN to be observable, at least
>>> some links of the network should be running near or at capacity.
>> Michael:
>> Better: "the aggregate rate of admitted flows on some links should come
>> close to the bandwidths of these links."
>>
>