IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-05 + homenet (notably multihoming)

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 24 April 2014 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2581A01C1 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qAMz8fcsDwPn for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBB61A01B3 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065EF1B8067 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4BD19005C; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:42:15 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DA35A826-938E-49EF-8E23-9242535B7538@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 06:42:11 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <033CEC61-EFCE-403E-BDF1-A306A19F8CEB@nominum.com>
References: <DA35A826-938E-49EF-8E23-9242535B7538@iki.fi>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/-9EsisVBzK4sP1oQ0aEpbP2fuCc
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-05 + homenet (notably multihoming)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:42:32 -0000

On Apr 24, 2014, at 5:26 AM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> wrote:
> I think the design could work at least given routing is moderately stable. Comments?

That's a pretty big "if".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email