IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-05 + homenet (notably multihoming)

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 24 April 2014 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9171A01AA for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmN7gS9iyICp for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195A61A0191 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398AF1B8078 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2978B19005C; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:12:54 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BD985AF-EBF1-4FFF-88ED-D2211CCD0807@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:12:51 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B1197EE1-7B48-4B82-B520-10AD53E49ADC@nominum.com>
References: <DA35A826-938E-49EF-8E23-9242535B7538@iki.fi> <033CEC61-EFCE-403E-BDF1-A306A19F8CEB@nominum.com> <4BD985AF-EBF1-4FFF-88ED-D2211CCD0807@iki.fi>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/cyTvKsO9qZ30iCYrJBn3GUdTd0I
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-05 + homenet (notably multihoming)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:13:07 -0000

On Apr 24, 2014, at 7:02 AM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> wrote:
> In a homenet-ish IPv4 case, you have to have moderately stable routing, or you may flap between different CPEs. And bad things happen in that case given different NATs in each, even without PCP..

Possibly so.   What you are proposing sounds brittle to me, but that is just an intuitive reaction, and it may be that if you presented a more detailed analysis I would react differently.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email