[pcp] DS-Lite "plain mode" (Was: Re: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire-recursive-pcp)
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 26 July 2013 08:20 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859121F8F2E for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVglasqfNF83 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7798121F84CD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:2001::1000]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4810403DC for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <51F23156.1040104@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:20:38 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcp@ietf.org
References: <09D9F37E-8339-412C-B703-4DBC9A96696A@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EE4BA569B@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <10106ED6-5FF5-4C03-8F2E-8AFCE2D0812A@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EE6E83194@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EE6E83194@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [pcp] DS-Lite "plain mode" (Was: Re: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire-recursive-pcp)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:20:46 -0000
Le 2013-07-26 10:05, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com a écrit : >> Why can't IPv4 PCP requests be sent over IPv4 (over the DS-Lite IPv6 >> tunnel), just like a IPv4 TCP SYNs? > > [Med] The plain mode is what is implemented in most platforms I'm aware of, and it is the mode adopted by the WG. Why did the WG adopt this method in the first place? Why did those platforms do it that way? There must be a reason... Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire-rec… Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire… Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire… mohamed.boucadair
- [pcp] DS-Lite "plain mode" (Was: Re: draft-ietf-p… Simon Perreault
- Re: [pcp] DS-Lite "plain mode" (Was: Re: draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy and draft-cheshire… Dan Wing