Re: [Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99

I am ok with putting the OHB in the payload and E2E DTMF.

However, I would prefer the "lite" Option to Option A.

Emil said:

"No, this makes no sense"

[BA] Seems to me that the "lite" option is more likely to be implemented
than "Option A".

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:

> Because I assume this is also a call for consensus on the list (and
> that you are not just informing us of something that happened off list
> as if it were a done deal):
>
> >     - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying
> repair on
> > the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
>
> No, this makes no sense. It would be embarrassing to have IETFs name
> associated with this.
>
> Emil
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > At the IETF 99 meeting, we took hum on the following proposals and there
> was
> > a strong consensus in the room in their favor, but we wish to gather any
> > additional inputs on the list.
> > So, if there are any additional inputs that was not expressed in the
> room,
> > please send them to the list by 4th August.
> >
> > First Consensus Call:
> >    Allow MD to modify the 'M' (marker) bit.
> >
> > Second Consensus called made includes all the following 3 proposals as a
> > singleton:
> >     - Move the OHB information from header extension to payload
> >     - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying
> repair on
> > the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
> >     - DTMF : PERC will only support E2E DTMF and MD will not be able to
> read
> > DTMF info sent as media
> >
> > Here are the notes from the meeting:
> >   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/minutes/minutes-99-perc-01.txt
> >
> > Here are the slides corresponding to the above proposals :
> >   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-
> 99-perc-double-01.pdf
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Perc Chairs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Perc mailing list
> > Perc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> https://jitsi.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perc mailing list
> Perc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc
>