Re: [Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99

[Suhas Nandakumar <[e-mail]>]

Hello All

   Following up on the consensus confirmation email, the chairs have
considered all the inputs received from the people in the room and the
inputs from people on the email list and determined there is consensus for
the following 2 items.

1.   Allow MD to modify the 'M' (marker) bit.

2. Includes all the below
    - Move the OHB information from header extension to payload
    - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying repair
on the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
    - DTMF : PERC will only support E2E DTMF and MD will not be able to
read DTMF info sent as media

Thanks for your inputs.

Cheers
Chairs

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> At the IETF 99 meeting, we took hum on the following proposals and there
> was a strong consensus in the room in their favor, but we wish to gather
> any additional inputs on the list.
> So, if there are any additional inputs that was not expressed in the room,
> please send them to the list by *4th August.*
>
> First Consensus Call:
>    Allow MD to modify the 'M' (marker) bit.
>
> Second Consensus called made includes all the following 3 proposals as a
> singleton:
>     - Move the OHB information from header extension to payload
>     - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying repair
> on the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
>     - DTMF : PERC will only support E2E DTMF and MD will not be able to
> read DTMF info sent as media
>
> Here are the notes from the meeting:
>   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/minutes/minutes-99-perc-01.txt
>
> Here are the slides corresponding to the above proposals :
>   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-perc-double-01.pdf
>
>
> Thanks
> Perc Chairs
>