IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94A131D2E for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNTQMorL5PHb for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E485D126B6E for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t37so71941386qtg.5 for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VRjUhooOHcGEiDx8FsDnidJJpx0o2Jl5CZt402EL+Rk=; b=ZathXDdlpNUi29WqGRwU5x7ldTtldsTeOYZZL7izZ0HumB/1Hm2VE2iKH+hg3A9WnH 3B1OwGVEj+yoIv5sx7n7t8XgHKyHWgPcZizyjRdjWXs/8E98rd96VOxhSO2Ix0BgUI82 3GZUkEn2IJSZHJCGPYBkbmKGKjQVvEuR0ehil9WdQjotI2ya6KmTtJzTnz7yVjvieeMg tUW8kMhpt1HxUVxX9KPpqwPXe1hWrAn+CBntjwJ+awiqZuXH5OGEJqXQXNJ43s9D44fH 2Sa/idiHB4pedlIUOfcY/qylR0/ETg0P9JycQX/1ObOJ6NSkNOPm+QF5zXt3cacLrXOW FJhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VRjUhooOHcGEiDx8FsDnidJJpx0o2Jl5CZt402EL+Rk=; b=HRwOqpTnKgvpjzfq4el6cEKL8BML0hgG/P4rYODzy31Nrl8D5rx2o+qHtNIsn2lPXj 23YNL52iXTtFKLXDe/GyzHGCtR0LmUtrV7dKwal2m4X+QBTmuC0SnQl2sN7I5HmA/x49 iddXhrxdccSBT1QqeL9CqeIB49gIckp/oCzGI9ZQnx9RNFpKh8aJ5LzKPT/JZGYacWUK KkgnA0r+69t4vN5sXa91ktiJ8nwNUmjjvDpp1sRAiUjPGVMpypacIs4EPGw8raAJbzOS tG85vp4wR3bErqJX1BkumR/q+SN4TaLZ9YOrYeF2wiu+kc36VbfXsVO7MeBxy9+NDtAm vqjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113rVEGVI+ZKb38nHiM8CnnDW8PXu7LUC5O7H0zZ2VaHMRNOCyXN tktORnGBxtYUT451oCGueHkSUXdppQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.35.215 with SMTP id r23mr7919418qtr.229.1501179632857; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.130.196 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaaJJmah4-b6uV0Q604pKd6XYVV095SkEYOrZtW9rzLwYZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMRcRGRW4JkyTSfUeDVWrXGAt0_x-yWhAzdKXDjkUJ0XH-P7cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaJJmah4-b6uV0Q604pKd6XYVV095SkEYOrZtW9rzLwYZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:20:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGQ0zBwM-gX5R3AOd36xp7BFjmtDzUqs6zCGzKc3K5uVNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Cc: perc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135a908c2b6c90555509e57"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/kToDk9viMw-AdGCPp-lT9aX6220>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:27:25 -0000

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:

> On a different note. The slides you quote seem to say this:
>
> > Exciting and awesome joint proposal from Sergio, Cullen, Emil, & Alex
> that none of us like and all of us can live with (ietf bumpy consensus)
>
> I am not sure how my name ended up in this list. The two PERC points I
> am concerned about (wedging double SRTP for RTX and FEC and
> overwriting SSRCs) still seem to be in debate and I have yet to see
> something that represents consensus there.
>

 Hello Emil

    Sorry for the confusion on the slide deck. We did get an update request
from the double presenters that your name be removed from that list in the
slide deck. Nils has the copy of the modified slide deck and he will upload
that version once he is back from the vacation.

Here is the video link for the same that has the updated slide deck:
  https://youtu.be/PK4yunnH364?list=PLC86T-6ZTP5jdbiwi5ggLNnwLn1-r0M4h&t=375


Cheers
Suhas


>
> Emil
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > At the IETF 99 meeting, we took hum on the following proposals and there
> was
> > a strong consensus in the room in their favor, but we wish to gather any
> > additional inputs on the list.
> > So, if there are any additional inputs that was not expressed in the
> room,
> > please send them to the list by 4th August.
> >
> > First Consensus Call:
> >    Allow MD to modify the 'M' (marker) bit.
> >
> > Second Consensus called made includes all the following 3 proposals as a
> > singleton:
> >     - Move the OHB information from header extension to payload
> >     - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying
> repair on
> > the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
> >     - DTMF : PERC will only support E2E DTMF and MD will not be able to
> read
> > DTMF info sent as media
> >
> > Here are the notes from the meeting:
> >   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/minutes/minutes-99-perc-01.txt
> >
> > Here are the slides corresponding to the above proposals :
> >   https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-
> 99-perc-double-01.pdf
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Perc Chairs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Perc mailing list
> > Perc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> https://jitsi.org
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email