Re: [perpass] Yet Another Reason why ALL CLEARTEXT MUST BE ELIMINATED!

Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net> Thu, 12 December 2013 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jacob@appelbaum.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B431AE05B for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BnGdriTJfGdo for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com (mail-qe0-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9961AE124 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a11so136403qen.5 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=si+8iOfVzpDAtem6Mg4BfLTGUTis2J9n/dQqthVD+Ak=; b=a2oVu9Xx4kEUeIlceYVjfXJNOL8MmcT0mtZHt4iHODMBGa3YJSrGGMRk44B/Nj78qU b0ZPLGTjj39iNShliY8OkB5fj08l+fI2xmhAcBV/rXztqOjscyAleWBsEvYPDPmjxMOH 0L9AiimClQR1XGiVNB1j5iejYhfpKSmorSU55+2VS1oORKQ3dmcZJlondVkp9VXZ6fOk h4Uayv5Cv3NRZuQYLV4INsdYezdOUXjjNJJfbu69NpOANCIosgKNJ/H1BPazxIzSAa7z lit0M2S+diblvkM4gXgk7gJfKqB+3RJS3qw96eRdYeKPW1WGpRyjjH979WIz4sZD+WE+ yQcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVg5r8ArMi5tzJv342Hvs9l/Qwbm27vLY2Kbs52jMeXPe4rM0I1/w79SfNc1DSWDVUUmig
X-Received: by 10.49.38.37 with SMTP id d5mr11805358qek.17.1386845091393; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (cs-tor.bu.edu. [204.8.156.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ki4sm62373223qeb.0.2013.12.12.02.44.49 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A98BF0.2080804@appelbaum.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:12:00 +0000
From: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Millnert <martin@millnert.se>
References: <0932E601-895B-457B-9F2D-DD79626AE0F0@icsi.berkeley.edu> <1386785782.584816710@apps.rackspace.com> <7E5F9EAE-053F-46BF-A47A-E66CFC74CEB8@icsi.berkeley.edu> <1386793256.7652.31.camel@pishuli.lund.millnert.se>
In-Reply-To: <1386793256.7652.31.camel@pishuli.lund.millnert.se>
OpenPGP: id=4193A197
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: wilton@isoc.org, perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Yet Another Reason why ALL CLEARTEXT MUST BE ELIMINATED!
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:44:59 -0000

Martin Millnert:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 11:44 -0800, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:16 AM, wilton@isoc.org wrote:
>>
>>> And this time *with* the link... I hate it when I do that.
>>> http://webpolicy.org/2013/12/09/metaphone-the-nsa-three-hop/
>>> Robin
>>
>> Everyone on this group should be considered within the "3 hop" rule.
>>
>> Edward Snowden <-> Various Reporters And Others I've Identified <-> Me <-> You all.
>>
>> Enjoy.
> 
> Two hop is actually sufficient, since Jake's participating here. :-)
> 

Indeed. I'm happy to have all of you in my graph - especially those who
are the most stubborn and accidental supporters of decisions that
increase surveillance!

All the best,
Jacob