Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ???
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C901AE305 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:55:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l8vT4NQ9_XhQ for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9E71AE2F3 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:44400 helo=comsec.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1Vq2Eg-0004ed-17 for perpass@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:55:02 -0500
Message-ID: <52A5D9C5.1050700@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:55:01 -0500
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+LwijWwanC+KLaSC-Kgq4vP=8in8Juo2Gbd=URh4zVf55nA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwijWwanC+KLaSC-Kgq4vP=8in8Juo2Gbd=URh4zVf55nA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050400010409050703010606"
Subject: Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ???
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:55:09 -0000
Phillip, > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Hannes Tschofenig > <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net <mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>> wrote: > > Hi Stephen, Hi Nicholas, > > it would be interesting (as a history lesson) if someone could > tell us why the group at that time decided to develop a NULL > encryption mechanism. Stephen Kent (co-author of RFC 2410) might > remember. I have no heard > > > It was for testing no, it was not. please see my response to Hannes. Steve
- [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Merike Kaeo
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Merike Kaeo
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Yoav Nir
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Moriarty, Kathleen
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Yoav Nir
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Michael Richardson
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Michael Richardson
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Moriarty, Kathleen
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Paul Wouters
- Re: [perpass] NULL Cipher RFC 2410 to HISTORIC ??? Paul Ferguson