IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Howdy!

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 14 September 2013 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5152211E8227 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bk2YYmb3wRM5 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7A111E8224 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8EJvOru029347; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379188650; bh=MXSBBbruUP2flLZe7lGkFMA7am2bFUxqOyU5GDB+1hw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2DdT0M5QAZzr+ORsiVFMCmOyYKRuT1cnL0YgUmoxDzabaiwSEmVMaE7XYM2gKe0/e SY02LFUYAmguBrJMkFk/ZOZMBY3wXG32ax1AZVP+xmAEk7Siyu+l5qxWsvSfBqW0Ja qw1638mtMy6pc1/r2uiJK9ulWuRnsOzhMG8wq0kw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1379188650; i=@resistor.net; bh=MXSBBbruUP2flLZe7lGkFMA7am2bFUxqOyU5GDB+1hw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=UvH0A3aTv5jjSWRR4fnzWdn13+HzG2FbLE+50oW3auAtqSziJ1dI9TgMA4u92NSS4 AVAFn1jcOgOn+dVB6LTidXs2APDSNzAV4OjfU8SvEATsvslf55ikIsViqf8yegBwCG TD46iXCrSjDvIuBGkbfBYpsamnRUPhhYCfyFvClQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914120157.0b38b130@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:36:11 -0700
To: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <5234A2E3.2050604@appelbaum.net>
References: <CAOHm=4ujOYTHO63EFWMYJBgxUWq00zezYKAJ8B4Vgf_C=xRRVg@mail.gmail.com> <5224DF25.60503@cs.tcd.ie> <7C92613E-33E8-48A6-A152-E9DBB29DEC04@softarmor.com> <522A328A.5060008@cs.tcd.ie> <522E17F9.4000206@bbn.com> <7DA623C5-E8C4-437F-BFC9-0CDD350853A8@softarmor.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130914054829.0b2a32d8@resistor.net> <5234A2E3.2050604@appelbaum.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [perpass] Howdy!
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:57:41 -0000

Hi Jacob,
At 10:54 14-09-2013, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>Seems like that isn't a problem now, right? Water under the bridge,
>perhaps? I have also seen a lot of IETF privacy and security weirdness
>but it is clear that things are improving now.

I already commented about the problem on the relevant list.  There 
was an interesting message from Yoav Nir ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg82383.html ).  I 
don't know whether things are improving.

>I don't think that this is a problem at all. I see people from a dozen
>countries on this list.

I commented on two drafts this week (see 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg82438.html and 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg82466.html ).

I posted the following last year 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/current/msg00230.html

>What are you referring to with regard to a Tor exit node being compromised?

I'll comment off-list.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email