Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED5811E8248 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJIBEG7Ur-St for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E8911E822E for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-218.bbn.com ([128.89.89.218]:51273) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1VCBmX-000666-7F for perpass@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:01:17 -0400
Message-ID: <5214F25D.6070707@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:01:17 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <5214E525.7020702@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <5214E525.7020702@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:01:37 -0000
I might be more impressed if the sender of the message understood that one does not use EC(DH) to encrypt/decrypt anything! > Hi, > > FYI, there's a thread on the LISP wg list [1] that also seems > relevant here. > > S. > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg04659.html > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > perpass@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
- [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Nick Thomas
- Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Nick Thomas
- Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion Stephen Kent