IETF Logo Mail Archive

(NAT) Re: Interactions between IPSEC and NAT

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> Thu, 05 February 1998 17:36 UTC

Delivery-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 12:36:15 -0500
Return-Path: owner-nat@livingston.com
Received: from bast.livingston.com (bast.livingston.com [149.198.247.2]) by ietf.org (8.8.7/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id MAA14494 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 12:36:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.livingston.com (server.livingston.com [149.198.1.70]) by bast.livingston.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA09138; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 09:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by server.livingston.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id JAA17146 for nat-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 09:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <19980205122425.49108@hazel>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 12:24:25 -0500
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
To: perry@piermont.com
Cc: Cheng_Chen@3com.com, Dan Nessett <Dan_Nessett@tdc.3com.com>, nat@livingston.com, paul_douglas@3com.com, raj_bhatia@3com.com, ken_araujo@3com.com
Subject: (NAT) Re: Interactions between IPSEC and NAT
References: <852565A1.0082AA92.00@hqoutbound.ops.3com.com> <199802051632.LAA05572@jekyll.piermont.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88
In-Reply-To: <199802051632.LAA05572@jekyll.piermont.com>; from Perry E. Metzger on Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 11:32:46AM -0500
Sender: owner-nat@livingston.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Cheng_Chen@3com.com writes:
> > We all lock our house every morning when we go to work, although we know
> > that any average thief will be able to break it.  So many of us pay $3000
> > to install the home security system, although we know that any average
> > thief will cut your power line to disable the security system before they
> > enter the house.  NAT is valuable to many people.  As a NAT user, a less
> > than perfect security is better than NO security at all.  Don't you lock
> > your front door every morning?

Multiplication isn't fast enough, I want to modify it so that I can
continue to use all my algorithms which are based on addition without
any modification... To someone that uses addition, a less than perfect
solution is better than NO solution at all. Don't you balance your
checkbook?

-- 
Raul, didn't bother sending this to ipsec...
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe nat' in the body of the message.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email