Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC

Hi Xufeng,

Please revise the draft and then we will send to iesg. It may be difficult for people to get motivated to review our yang drafts so we will rely upon your, the other draft authors and the yang doctors, yang expertise for thorough review. 

thanks,
mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Xufeng Liu [mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 6:51 AM
To: 'Stig Venaas'; Michael McBride
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC

Hi Stig,

Thanks for the valuable comments. We will check them and revise the draft.

We certainly hope more review comments.

Regards,

- Xufeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pim [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stig Venaas
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:17 PM
> To: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
> Cc: pim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC
> 
> Here are some quick comments from me.
> 
> There is a TODO list (section 6). Will you do more work on this, or should
the
> section be removed?
> 
> Should BFD be in the model like this? What is the local-multiplier?
> 
> It looks like queue size and overflow statistics are per VRF? Is it normal
that
> implementations do this per VRF? Or it it global?
> 
> Shouldn't there be stats for DF election messages.
> 
> "Grouping" is spelled as "Gouring" or "Gouping" several places.
> 
> Stig
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I expect the contents of this model is quite important for most
> > vendors that have a pim implementation, and also to a lot of
> > operators. So I hope you all can have a close look at this and see how
> > it matches your implementations and whether it matches operators'
> > needs. It is expected that vendors will need to augment the model in
> > many cases though, as the model tries to address what is common
> > between vendors. I'm hoping that what we have is good as a handful of
> > vendors have been involved in the design team, but we would like you
> > to have a careful look at it.
> >
> > Note that we're doing this last call already now, as there is pressure
> > from operators to get IETF models.
> >
> > Stig
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Michael McBride
> > <Michael.McBride@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Today begins a 2 week WGLC for draft-ietf-pim-yang-02. Please give it
> >> a review and comment about its readiness to be sent to the IESG.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pim-yang-02.txt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> mike
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pim mailing list
> >> pim@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim