Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC

"Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 August 2016 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8FC12D61A for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7eexMJ-CegxZ for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F8712B015 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f93so101316013lfi.2 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=WIRJeDO51jRdSvLovGAkjPcQTMXgX/BmBaj3iaVGa3c=; b=h+GenknR8Nkd645Blq2a8gO0kfhg/nXskBvET9Nv5fl/+kcZI6RwgeP32Mgxx/sGcU P5NbPxAnHXXi0GAeY0M22dfmgNh3d0/iDEaStcX6kVp1dXA/UQiRSmxIgS40U2U/dxlJ XrLb+1ReItT8+U1gTmC91hufsJrY7p/+46N4DBu6lOoIqvlwcyTevanfAZ1I5QHBsCHj BTZPVeuQGkDAGos2hObbHsxiIz4LQ4/2ofgfpMz6WOvkygEsXDX9jm5GRrl4Y52eMFgT QxlnhvbK/6ddkzdulBpR6qAjwS+HjZb2XiKTS5+Jk8oyG8Cq9crWChtl1FG/vlQge3Q3 OT6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=WIRJeDO51jRdSvLovGAkjPcQTMXgX/BmBaj3iaVGa3c=; b=QDr6Okb1j6btcUbWCWdkPKqlknEjUAYS7gMVNJo0tktBgRp7AAh267XiA1ynUWvRoo hy6AbhuixDbBRte6gdqudJZkGIh5s1XfW9bfvVl8GJO7khtBNDODqcr2q3vhTzIz16Cp GpMRozagyBxi7mQUuyMvYZuDUGMNaH1YZ4CUHll5nP1BAaHNXZuDAiBbz+KcFlCX6QEL /iOqRDIrU3l1HGrdimqvCVSXwydwWYrZgsTR7UPsR5JLd2MnRSZkeNYyRhNF7PM2j59Y 4MJwro6ayv59MhdT/+WXbWwnPK4jo/V/f4rHzPbUL0rAJzQ6Pe0GnafOz7YeFXxsvd5O 3oIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNJwd4o7hEYv8tA0mWXC4A3f9Akw1zBI1diA3Nf6BBvQgm5SBR+ZkZLHrHXrxo6WA==
X-Received: by 10.25.215.145 with SMTP id q17mr5422621lfi.30.1472478678254; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l19sm6487608lfi.24.2016.08.29.06.51.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Stig Venaas' <stig@venaas.com>, 'Michael McBride' <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
References: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A09FBC8FB@dfweml501-mbx> <CAHANBt+GKCUhhZH1NCERq6R5+KbkppUJ6oBK2OAKmGEB2osq-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHANBt+k3AZoaLPgX1QmJ0eg-rZ6oMkAgepX6o8yL4inXXfj2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBt+k3AZoaLPgX1QmJ0eg-rZ6oMkAgepX6o8yL4inXXfj2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:51:15 -0400
Message-ID: <02c701d201fc$6b2b4570$4181d050$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGEmWKqFNpCxwOPYBgp9jjtKyZuIgHZW5B6AcUfBVqg3dEJYA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/BONwe17fd8phgcypa7Vw-Ox9--Y>
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:51:25 -0000

Hi Stig,

Thanks for the valuable comments. We will check them and revise the draft.

We certainly hope more review comments.

Regards,

- Xufeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pim [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stig Venaas
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:17 PM
> To: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
> Cc: pim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-yang-02 WGLC
> 
> Here are some quick comments from me.
> 
> There is a TODO list (section 6). Will you do more work on this, or should
the
> section be removed?
> 
> Should BFD be in the model like this? What is the local-multiplier?
> 
> It looks like queue size and overflow statistics are per VRF? Is it normal
that
> implementations do this per VRF? Or it it global?
> 
> Shouldn't there be stats for DF election messages.
> 
> "Grouping" is spelled as "Gouring" or "Gouping" several places.
> 
> Stig
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I expect the contents of this model is quite important for most
> > vendors that have a pim implementation, and also to a lot of
> > operators. So I hope you all can have a close look at this and see how
> > it matches your implementations and whether it matches operators'
> > needs. It is expected that vendors will need to augment the model in
> > many cases though, as the model tries to address what is common
> > between vendors. I'm hoping that what we have is good as a handful of
> > vendors have been involved in the design team, but we would like you
> > to have a careful look at it.
> >
> > Note that we're doing this last call already now, as there is pressure
> > from operators to get IETF models.
> >
> > Stig
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Michael McBride
> > <Michael.McBride@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Today begins a 2 week WGLC for draft-ietf-pim-yang-02. Please give it
> >> a review and comment about its readiness to be sent to the IESG.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pim-yang-02.txt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> mike
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pim mailing list
> >> pim@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim