Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits wglc

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Tue, 25 June 2019 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4E11202BF for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyeJGz_clknL for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977321202BE for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id w13so28977008eds.4 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=jgn4XWuGC3uF6yA4bW8QB+d2GKfG+SHhU5/4rtqMcZs=; b=ADj4JMa6QSip88znuI410tru/R8Ll4RXcQUwGhOVR5G3aO93Rug1bgG2WLDaSSyPXB 1mIDP6RLpF+oTv/cjdFRIxyBziJ45YYqJRl52sYNJrolzgQFUTTQRnhaGYthJg6cPwZM Qaq5tXLwZDif/32R0vX7ivzcvh2CsxvdHDPePQiblFt5IBBIRo/FCHoRBpYxwMFJysad bnKFmJ7a3kgmFdyO+Hsds/5j9ESer2ab7oK9PWrGJybr/7BzWdVfdJS+/i2zzFuiJl5W udcfT/VPK5MO9BKpNVUjOjm1t2iX03n5G3cTaQj1bDhAx9BGLwgPAjcsOZIpbKp9yuad UGmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=jgn4XWuGC3uF6yA4bW8QB+d2GKfG+SHhU5/4rtqMcZs=; b=lTWFjqdr5HjBPWBOQ8PMHMApG9Iv3MZ6ibMss1elZ7n0II+UB4fX6gnttvM19hRyYo i5aCUXmaN4IJqugzsIAcia2htXdueiYm1F5PkjtRbVXGSJrQqB6KAtPHRl7GqjZkRejX fBDoEh+BpJUMjvAd17XGHe+qLu2wWN7EDiKW3p8OBKfgZeZxZBiPxfqWmm6n9965sPy3 V7w7Td+bL7py9Hu4ekXwfGVnj+w2QcYuovt7IDkqNBGZU8PmWeXAbtjS0c/NY1AE8C8z TAZ8qtdkxjeMPCCp2kjgjbvfV514bzV1zPK1QT/heC92ifbOCnuaQ8+j5IgALgIoMvLG UOig==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5/oIfnSv3edPQbmT/PTTH1XvBde/ccR+4AviM/tizfX0qYIlu Acg6hXXl1D3pFH1MvoR/JTWiyy70bWPCygT/pVmTPw==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:b14b:: with SMTP id l11mt341049edd.76.1561492778118; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL3FGfyE6Knsv+uTJEAVvAd3LxZB7oEwfsayHCxV6Q=A4ySTTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEz6PPQ+t-VBG95O0hp4v_2_tB_z19hJJA0i5pxY6LurTpptjg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz6PPQ+t-VBG95O0hp4v_2_tB_z19hJJA0i5pxY6LurTpptjg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:59:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtLdKzGHKCdNHCOu8FgkVLZ1qg2h1H8=2UA6p5MuEfmrDw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/Fa9dPX67028aY92Dsd6VJjvaM4U>
Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits wglc
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:59:41 -0000

Hi

I really appreciate the support, and in particular the careful reviews and
comments by Bill and Ian.

I agree the language regarding the 48 subtypes was rather clumsy. I've now
submitted version 02 that I hope addresses your concerns. The new text is:

   The type space defined by the existing PIM specifications is almost
   exhausted.  This document defines types 13, 14 and 15, such that each
   of these types has 16 subtypes, providing a total of 48 subtypes
   available for future pim extensions.  This is achieved by for each of
   the types 13, 14 and 15, using the four most significant flag bits
   (bits 4-7) as a new field to store the extended type.  These types
   are referred to as types 13.0 to 13.15, 14.0 to 14.15 and 15.0 to
   15.15, where the number after the dot denotes the value stored in the
   new field.

Let me know if you still have concerns.
Thanks,
Stig

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:50 AM Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Support.
>
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:00 PM Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello good people of pim..
>>
>> Today begins a two week wglc for draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits. Please
>> review the draft and reply with your support/non support. And have a
>> great weekend.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits/
>>
>> thanks,
>> mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pim mailing list
>> pim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim