Re: SIP Addressing Limitations
William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu> Wed, 19 May 1993 20:04 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09848; 19 May 93 16:04 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09844; 19 May 93 16:04 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24916; 19 May 93 16:04 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA23291> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Wed, 19 May 93 16:04:15 EDT
Received: from vela.acs.oakland.edu by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA23282> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip; Wed, 19 May 93 16:04:12 EDT
Received: from via.ws04.merit.edu by vela.acs.oakland.edu with SMTP id AA16763 (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4); Wed, 19 May 1993 15:59:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 12:34:26 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: William Allen Simpson <bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <1186.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
To: whyman@mwassocs.demon.co.uk
Cc: sip@caldera.usc.edu, pip@thumper.bellcore.com, tuba@lanl.gov
Reply-To: bsimpson@morningstar.com
Subject: Re: SIP Addressing Limitations
Some of the other commenters on the SIP list have been too polite. Perhaps you should actually READ my proposed plan (based on > 100 hours of my work, considerable work and thought by Steve Deering, and many comments by others). You can find it in *sip-64bit-plan*, at any internet-drafts directory. Comments and improvements are welcome. The plan manages to allocate enough space to locate every "continent" or "region" or "country" or "state" or "province" or "metropolitan area" or "provider" (all at once) on the planet in the first 24 bits (and most in 8 or 16 bits), with more room reserved for the rest of the solar system. That leaves a conservative estimate of 2^40 bits for use within each country. For the worst case, China, there are only 360,000,000 (repeat, three hundred sixty million) per person (estimated 2025 population), WITHOUT using the *HALF* of the number space used by IPAE. You could abuse your number space very badly, say by putting the phone number in those 10 digits of BCD. This would still handle the U.S. (57-bits) with 99.9992% (131,071/131,072) left over, and the U.K. (55-bits) with 99.997% (32,767/32,768) left over. That's not counting the additional 99.5% (1 - (10/16)^10) of the space that is wasted within the 10 digit BCD. Any other "limitations"? Please provide actual numbers with your reasoning. Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Paul Francis (formerly Paul Tsuchiya
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Paul Francis (formerly Paul Tsuchiya
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Robert Elz
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Robert Elz
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Dennis Ferguson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Paul Francis (formerly Paul Tsuchiya
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- SIP Addressing Limitations Tony Li
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Frank Kastenholz
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations tracym
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations William Allen Simpson
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Paul Francis (formerly Paul Tsuchiya
- SIP Addressing Limitations Tony Li
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Vince Fuller
- Re: SIP Addressing Limitations Robert Elz