IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] Derived Credentials. Was: Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol (SCEP)

Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> Wed, 12 November 2014 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Johannes.Merkle@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54D01A010F for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:42:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqiFWjv6sd5v for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20251A0121 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3B11A007A; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:42:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wk_G3Ec_-IWB; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:41:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0C61A006C; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:41:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.208.1.76] (10.208.1.76) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:42:02 +0100
Message-ID: <54639BE9.3020303@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:42:01 +0100
From: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C739B9DB295@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <D941FEB2-CC8D-4D9C-9496-F7C28B5E0C41@cisco.com> <54616B61.7000307@gmail.com> <703810FB-F786-4D7C-98EF-0DC6080CBEFB@cisco.com> <5462754A.4010802@gmail.com>, <5462DEE0.4010105@gmail.com> <DFD1E49C-A351-4763-A03C-5BD0F118E8CD@cisco.com> <54632785.8080702@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54632785.8080702@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.76]
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/0rdvyNxLNhbNPScrdUD-J7htxWc
Cc: "Dr. Massimiliano Pala" <massimiliano.pala@gmail.com>, "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pkix] Derived Credentials. Was: Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol (SCEP)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:42:14 -0000

Anders Rundgren wrote on 12.11.2014 10:25:
> On 2014-11-12 10:03, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote:
>> Anders - both of these requirements can be met by these protocols.
> 
> AFAICT, end-to-end security with respect to the *key-container* is outside of all
> PKIX enrollment protocols.  No CMS (Card Management System) use CMP, SCEP, EST
> directly, they use other protocols for actual token provisioning/initialization.
> 

This is not correct. I have participated in the implementation of two Card Management Systems that use CMP for smart
card initialization and provisioning. Both are operative, the first one managing over 8 million cards, the second one
over 60.000.



-- 
Johannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email