Re: [pkix] A non-compliant use of the EKU extension in Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy Version 2.1.

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8DA21F8B6D for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:29:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebA-3g8PEZZW for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776B421F8B69 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp89-089-230.bbn.com ([128.89.89.230]:52139) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1U7tp6-0006gR-TE; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:56 -0500
Message-ID: <5123E0C7.5020506@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:59 -0500
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Denis Pinkas <denis.pinkas@bull.net>, pkix <pkix@ietf.org>
References: <5123AD0B.4050709@bull.net>
In-Reply-To: <5123AD0B.4050709@bull.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [pkix] A non-compliant use of the EKU extension in Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy Version 2.1.
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:29:59 -0000

Denis,

I agree with your analysis of the situation, as seconded by David Cooper.

I think it unfortunate that Mozilla is advising folks to use EKU in a 
fashion that is not supported
by X.509 or 5280. (Specifically, a compliant RP should not reject a 
subordinate cert based on an EKU value
encountered in a CA cert higher in a cert path.)

While I appreciate the desire to have this sort of transitive scoping 
expressed via an EKU,
that extension, unlike some others in X.509/5280, does not offer this 
feature.  It would be
preferable to define a nee extension, rather that misinterpret an 
existing one.

Sorry, Stefan, but just because MS earlier did this doesn't make it 
right :-).

Steve