Re: [Policy] Re: draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-03.txt

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:23:50PM -0500, Larry S. Bartz wrote:
| Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote, On 08/29/03 10:14:
| > What an underwhelming interest in this document.
| > 
| > When I start reading it, I see in the abstract:
| >    This document defines a number of changes and extensions to the
| >    Policy Core LDAP Schema [PCLS] based on the specifications of the
| >    Policy Core Information Model Extensions [PCIM_EXT]. The changes
| >    include additional object classes previously not covered, deprecation
| >    of some object classes and changes to the object class hierarchy
| >    defined in [PCLS].
| > 
| > And so I immediately wonder... is it really OK that this document
| > deprecates some object classes ??
| > 
| > Possibly so... but I'd like to hear some of the PCIM, PCIM-EXT and
| > PCLS authors/ediotrs to explicitly say so. PLEASE!
| > 
| > Thanks,
| > Bert 

I have to admit that I'm not sold on the idea of deprecating classes for 
the following reasons:

1. I see no justification for why it's being proposed.

2. Most of the deprecations I see could be handled via inheritance
and semantics changes.  This would allow the items wanted without
changing the parent objects.

Ryan Moats

_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
Policy@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy