Re: POP3 highest number accessed
Steve Dorner <sdorner@uiuc.edu> Thu, 26 May 1994 01:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12427; 25 May 94 21:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12422; 25 May 94 21:52 EDT
Received: from PO6.ANDREW.CMU.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20736; 25 May 94 21:52 EDT
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po6.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) id VAA06078; Wed, 25 May 1994 21:12:11 -0400
Received: via switchmail; Wed, 25 May 1994 21:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/sq2/QF.shsypC200UdZQ1r3YY>; Wed, 25 May 1994 20:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po5.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/q001/QF.0hsygKK00Udd0TUk5V>; Wed, 25 May 1994 20:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (ux1.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.59]) by po5.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA08062 for <ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu>; Wed, 25 May 1994 20:19:28 -0400
Received: from dorner.slip.uiuc.edu by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA16076 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu>); Wed, 25 May 1994 19:19:11 -0500
Received: from [192.17.5.3] by dorner.slip.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA26021 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu>); Wed, 25 May 1994 19:19:22 -0500
X-Sender: sdorner@192.17.5.1
Message-Id: <aa09974f0f021015ef02@[192.17.5.3]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 19:19:04 -0500
To: POP3 IETF Mailing List <ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Dorner <sdorner@uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: POP3 highest number accessed
At 11:29 PM 5/24/94, John Gardiner Myers wrote: >It seems persistent-LAST and Status: are being used to do exactly the >same thing. The problem is that in it is impossible for a client to >determine that a server does not implement one or the other. True enough, and one of the reasons I'm abandoning both LAST and Status:. I think LAST should either be made persistent, and let the implementations catch up (we will have a patch for popper very soon, BTW), or it should be removed. I haven't yet heard anyone argue that a non-persistent LAST has any value; maybe there's something I can't think of. -- Steve Dorner, Qualcomm Incorporated "There's nothing wrong with you that can't be cured with a little Prozac and a polo mallet." - Woody Allen
- POP3 highest number accessed John Gardiner Myers
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed Glenn Anderson
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed Steve Dorner
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed John Gardiner Myers
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed Steve Dorner
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed John Gardiner Myers
- Re: POP3 highest number accessed Steve Dorner