Re: [PWE3] PW Redundancy to WG drafts?

Support for both drafts.

However I have some reservations concerning reliance to proprietary
(and Ethernet specific?) MC-LAG in draft-muley-pwe3-redundancy-02.txt --
perhaps some of the scenarios could be accomplished without it
(e.g. in figure 1 make PE2 master (PE1/PE3 slave) and let PE1/PE3 signal AC
status toward CE1 using native OAM (ATM AIS, TDM AIS, etc). Obviously
in some cases MC-LAG or equivalent might be needed, but I would like to
see cases where it is not needed presented as well (especially, as
defining these cases allows interoperability).

On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:07:13AM +0100, BOCCI Matthew wrote:
> In the PWE3 meeting in Vancouver, I asked if we could progress the
> following drafts to WG Status:
> 
> - draft-muley-pwe3-redundancy-02.txt : This contains the PW redundancy
> scenarios
> - draft-muley-dutta-pwe3-redundancy-bit-02.txt : Definition of the PW
> status bits  to support these PW redundancy scenarios.
> 
> We received a couple of comments in the meeting, but I would also
> appreciate some feedback on the list.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Matthew

> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

-- 
[Ville Hallivuori][vph@iki.fi][http://www.iki.fi/vph/]
[ID 8E1AD461][FP16=C9 50 E2 DF 48 F6 33 62  5D 87 47 9D 3F 2B 07 5D]
[ID 58543419][FP20=8731 941D 15AB D4A0 88A0  FC8F B55C F4C4 5854 3419]
[ID 8061C24E][FP20=C722 12DA 841E D811 DBFE  2FB3 174C E291 8061 C24E]

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3