RE: [PWE3] PW Redundancy to WG drafts?

I support both drafts becoming WG drafts.

I also suggest coordination of efforts on redundancy and load balancing
architecture
(as promised, I will write a draft ASAP).

Y(J)S

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 6:08 PM
To: pwe3; BOCCI Matthew
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PW Redundancy to WG drafts?

On Dec 6, 2007, at 4:07 PM, BOCCI Matthew wrote:

> In the PWE3 meeting in Vancouver, I asked if we could progress the 
> following drafts to WG Status:
>
> - draft-muley-pwe3-redundancy-02.txt : This contains the PW redundancy

> scenarios
> - draft-muley-dutta-pwe3-redundancy-bit-02.txt : Definition of the PW 
> status bits  to support these PW redundancy scenarios.
>
> We received a couple of comments in the meeting, but I would also 
> appreciate some feedback on the list.
>

Yes, I was planning to send an email on this.  Folks, we
either need to move forward with these documents (or
competing ones) or remove these related items from the
WG Goals & Milestones.

I.e., Now is the time to comment or contribute if you're
interested with this work.

-danny

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3