Re: [PWE3] PW Redundancy to WG drafts?

	Yes to both from my end.

	--Tom


> Yes to both.
>
> -Vach
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net]
>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:08 AM
>> To: pwe3; BOCCI Matthew
>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PW Redundancy to WG drafts?
>>
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2007, at 4:07 PM, BOCCI Matthew wrote:
>>
>>> In the PWE3 meeting in Vancouver, I asked if we could progress the
>>> following drafts to WG Status:
>>>
>>> - draft-muley-pwe3-redundancy-02.txt : This contains the PW
>> redundancy
>>> scenarios
>>> - draft-muley-dutta-pwe3-redundancy-bit-02.txt : Definition
>> of the PW
>>> status bits  to support these PW redundancy scenarios.
>>>
>>> We received a couple of comments in the meeting, but I would also
>>> appreciate some feedback on the list.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I was planning to send an email on this.  Folks, we
>> either need to move forward with these documents (or
>> competing ones) or remove these related items from the
>> WG Goals & Milestones.
>>
>> I.e., Now is the time to comment or contribute if you're
>> interested with this work.
>>
>> -danny
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3