Re: [Qirg] draft-wang-qirg-quantum-internet-use-cases-05 - Feedback on WG Adoption

[Melchior Aelmans <[e-mail]>]

Hi Wojtek,

No problem of course, I was just asking the question as I'm interested in
the motivation.
The Normal process is that the author(s) present his/their draft during the
WG meetings and then an adoption call (by the authors or chairs) follows on
the list, hence I was wondering why you wanted a meeting to discuss
adoption itself.
It is as simple as the email I will post below which has just recently been
sent to the MPLS WG mailing list to adopt a draft.

And no worries we are all learning every day :)

Cheers,
Melchior


Example adoption call email:

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting
draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam
as a MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list ([e-mail]). Please give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There is one IPR disclosure against this document.

The authors have stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.

The working group adoption poll ends May 15, 2020.

/Loa


On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:24 AM Wojciech Kozlowski <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Melchior,
>
> Current plan is to have another virtual interim where this will be an
> agenda point. Adoption will be confirmed on the mailing list anyway. It was
> my mistake in the first place to not leave time for this in the April
> meeting.
>
> I'm new to this chairing business so I'm consulting with Rod to make sure
> everything's by the book. Please bear with us :)
>
> Regards,
> Wojtek
>
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 20:52 +0200, Melchior Aelmans wrote:
>
> HI team,
>
> Just out of curiosity; why wait with adoption? If there's consensus to do
> so, preferably on the list so it's documented, then why not adopt? Do the
> chairs believe the draft is not ready for WG adoption yet?
>
> Regards,
> Melchior
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 3:29 AM Chonggang Wang <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Wojtek! We are ok with your suggestion.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Wojciech Kozlowski <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:10 AM
> *To:* [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Chonggang Wang
> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Qirg] draft-wang-qirg-quantum-internet-use-cases-05 -
> Feedback on WG Adoption
>
> See in-line
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 15:02 +0000, Chonggang Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Wojtek,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your email. Please see my responses inline below.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Chonggang
>
>
>
> *From:* Qirg <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Wojciech Kozlowski
> *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2020 8:25 AM
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Qirg] draft-wang-qirg-quantum-internet-use-cases-05 -
> Feedback on WG Adoption
>
>
>
> Hi Chonggang,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your work on this draft. The question about adoption is
> important and there should've been some time left for this question at the
> virtual interim. It's my fault for packing the agenda too tightly so I do
> apologise for that.
>
>
>
> [CW]: It’s not an issue. I have followed your advice to continue the
> question through the mailing list and positive feedback about adoption has
> been received.
>
>
>
> There have been voices of support on the mailing list so perhaps we can
> leave this question until the next meeting (virtual or face-to-face) so it
> can be discussed properly? We can then make sure it receives the right
> amount of time on the agenda.
>
>
>
> [CW]: It seems IETF/IRTF WG/RG adoption decisions typically can be made on
> the mailing list.  We presented the draft during the virtual F2F, and there
> has been substantial discussions on the mailing list (over the last few
> months) and good support for adoption on the mailing list (over the last
> few weeks).  So another approach would be to adopt it now (as it has met
> all the typical adoption criteria in IRTF).  However, we can also wait
> until the next virtual interim if you feel more presentations and
> discussions would be useful.  We (as the authors) are good with either
> approach.
>
>
>
> [WK] Yes, can we please wait until the next meeting. My suggestion was
> motivated by the fact that I'm under the impression that the mailing list
> gets less attention from the community shortly after a meeting. This tends
> to pick up again in the run-up to the next meeting. The support indicated
> on the mailing list is positive and together with Rod we will make sure
> sufficient time is allocated for this point at the next meeting and the
> charter definitely indicates a need for a discussion about use cases. This
> is what I meant that there should've been time at the previous meeting for
> this. If there won't be a QIRG meeting at IETF 108 (virtual or F2F), we can
> revisit it on the mailing list then to not delay unnecessarily.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wojtek
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 14:22 +0000, Chonggang Wang wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As you know, draft-wang-qirg-quantum-internet-use-cases-05 was presented
> in yesterday’s interim meeting. We are following chairs’ advice to continue
> discussion on the mailing list.
>
>
>
> This I-D was initiated in Jan 2020. Since then, many valuable inputs have
> been received from QIRG community and this I-D has been revised for five
> rounds.  We would like to get and appreciate your feedback on:
>
>
>
> Is this I-D ready for WG adoption?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Chonggang
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Banner]
>
> [image: Banner]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.interdigital.com_white-5Fpapers_streaming-2Dmedia-2Dreport-2D&d=DwMFAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m=qUUMXKB_IFEJOhA3VDdXh7BDHitIit-s-Wgph9Ojk2Q&s=O_meSgu76FoDn5sonICcuR5AdrYRXGuw2UjeDVe3Zig&e=>
>
> ABI - Streaming Media Report
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.interdigital.com_white-5Fpapers_streaming-2Dmedia-2Dreport-2D&d=DwMFAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m=qUUMXKB_IFEJOhA3VDdXh7BDHitIit-s-Wgph9Ojk2Q&s=O_meSgu76FoDn5sonICcuR5AdrYRXGuw2UjeDVe3Zig&e=>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other
> than its intended recipient. Unintended transmission shall not constitute
> waiver of any privilege or confidentiality obligation. If you received this
> communication in error, please do not review, copy or distribute it, notify
> me immediately by email, and delete the original message and any
> attachments. Unless expressly stated in this e-mail, nothing in this
> message or any attachment should be construed as a digital or electronic
> signature.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Qirg mailing list
>
> [e-mail]
>
> https://urldefense..proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.irtf.org_mailman_listinfo_qirg&d=DwICAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m=qUUMXKB_IFEJOhA3VDdXh7BDHitIit-s-Wgph9Ojk2Q&s=lKOx_gYCRFnMpH4PXbgsLHnxCSPQ6_wsH0KalGo2PxU&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.irtf.org_mailman_listinfo_qirg&d=DwICAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m=qUUMXKB_IFEJOhA3VDdXh7BDHitIit-s-Wgph9Ojk2Q&s=lKOx_gYCRFnMpH4PXbgsLHnxCSPQ6_wsH0KalGo2PxU&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qirg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.irtf.org_mailman_listinfo_qirg&d=DwMFaQ&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m=rg8lhHkODgZ4NUCG-CkGt4ZuJXpuzCLljHxIjmBw0dQ&s=NpRRjziCgo2s3l2hu0teQQb5Tv4O-9lulYih1gD0XIk&e=>
>
>