Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sending probe packet has duplicated text (#3468)

ianswett <> Mon, 17 February 2020 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587311200F5 for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:10:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9Xar448AZ5w for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3721C120041 for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:10:27 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581981027; bh=5Ti+/Fw5ojefLES5pMibUTQXNAs1Z0WKguqx/MKa8rg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=H+x52KiMj8BGbQpdO2DwjTL6HpZqwYGgaCDgssnH8yfxCNXcT1grJfMKn+kWgaQDZ JGIYxUMQ7KhHzxDrpvVoN9DTCFkRmRbP8aVMlZs1KmF3oT3MyPjyVI1lg2xSViScGj MUt/fnJLLI86uFEmfYnwqV/brjeY3HjJs9kZff9w=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3468/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sending probe packet has duplicated text (#3468)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4b1d6391001_35763fc9f80cd968112850"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 23:10:31 -0000

I'm happy to change it to a MAY.

FWIW, "TCP Control Block Interdependence" is not a good name for that draft in my opinion.  And it seems like almost none of the potential considerations are TCP-specific, so is the reason this is in tcpm a historical quirk?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: