Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange discussion of cancellation and rejection (#3926)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 22 July 2020 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018B3A085D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqTC3WSGK_ri for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-12.smtp.github.com (out-12.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596053A0859 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-6b40fdd.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-6b40fdd.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.64]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A19121107 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595449077; bh=yIsDXBo28WHGk/GAOUMrtt4vAd5h93wy1dXQqSsoxcw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=asHw6rWvkLrO5YBpu4ikwjWrjlldkS2wW68lqv4Quqc+4gdNlFoFxsQjpoOiDEgAK svK5iyWx1C4Gc2TwHlAURHPSH8leKgRHqpQ2GlIHTQwvsm/T0x8y6R8M/n2C2u0tq4 e9SsLDUMGvOZiVKZqniPrFrdrMGWUpsG4KMNrs5w=
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:17:57 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2YKTQAUHASQL3B47N5ER77LEVBNHHCPCDOBQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3926/review/453652582@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3926@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3926@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange discussion of cancellation and rejection (#3926)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f189ef5690aa_9423fc4184cd9681571dd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/5o7vbG7eijb5ULIQN3_ty2dzry4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:18:00 -0000

@MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> -some higher layer of software that might have taken some action as a result. The
-client can treat requests rejected by the server as though they had never been
-sent at all, thereby allowing them to be retried later on a new connection.
-Servers MUST NOT use the H3_REQUEST_REJECTED error code for requests which
-were partially or fully processed.  When a server abandons a response after
-partial processing, it SHOULD abort its response stream with the error code
-H3_REQUEST_CANCELLED.
-
-When a client resets a request with the error code H3_REQUEST_CANCELLED, a
-server MAY abruptly terminate the response using the error code
-H3_REQUEST_REJECTED if no processing was performed.  Clients MUST NOT use the
-H3_REQUEST_REJECTED error code, except when a server has requested closure of
-the request stream with this error code.
-
-If a stream is cancelled after receiving a complete response, the client MAY
+Once a request has been sent, it MAY be cancelled by either endpoint.  Clients

Technically, the stream needn't have any bytes sent.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3926#discussion_r459057618