Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing the Default QUIC ACK Policy (#3529)

Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404A13A09B4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4DJ2QvcBCaSo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-13.smtp.github.com (out-13.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED1883A09CC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.39]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0F3261565 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585052923; bh=mICa0yCopP5uiFb/DcHgJRU0d9wTKvBQl6qTF1ScGKs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jzgLrNARR1A/HHcmhzXtZq+v60KCo7UJG3GyUmPuhR6k08Jnsm1vvOjSHfXxxjkru vYOdaSwKoIgZ0IpuOR2dHAatZYodu9AGDnRj3dbh4AGc7yC1fcANsK8i0cBC9iZio2 2UwhgCZwuGN7tU72rL1jvnsr3vk+4am1Swm+cg74=
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:28:43 -0700
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5WTXJRDVKLAXK5MFN4QXO7XEVBNHHCFSANWY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529/603210051@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing the Default QUIC ACK Policy (#3529)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e79fcfb35c30_48d13fc9e88cd95c115553"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6itShZSDqbrdTW0VgSizbhnCEGk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:28:57 -0000

If the receiver knew the cwnd... we could add that.

The current proposal we made is here (along with some of the arguments about why QUIC and TCP are slightly different): draft-fairhurst-quic-ack-scaling

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529#issuecomment-603210051