IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing the Default QUIC ACK Policy (#3529)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Thu, 19 March 2020 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D6C3A0DF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DnQ6Ju17JDJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7D13A0DF4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-52827f8.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-52827f8.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.108.24]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3163D121127 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1584646636; bh=2y7L7PER8er7JcTxf9Pt4cC0rYUnJUOouvk4jhRXVCw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pMk7eVjMlc9FNaYo9+dcosV4LqcoTGT95CigANi1ElPlCv5NoI1DWyLP75zG+dBbl TqQ/54n4CCYSOZRTX+HOhv+pv7hTsNDpIoNnZrQK3qT8OpSmuVEQY2r3bch0YX7lIY uqkVANVdyi99NmRBBVOnNY93A37SmZjzGPJdO5OY=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:37:15 -0700
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4UUYYQMRMFM42GV2N4P6VOXEVBNHHCFSANWY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529/601378758@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing the Default QUIC ACK Policy (#3529)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e73c9ebe0a17_44c03ff2374cd95c1087e1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PVpRM9dWYMcaih0Z3iLqv9jYXoI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:37:19 -0000

Even though we've avoided straying this far from the TCP spec, I think allowing this would be good for the internet. It should probably be documented for TCP, too.

How does ack stretching of this nature work for BBR bandwidth estimation? It's harder to use the ack pacing, no?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3529#issuecomment-601378758

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email