Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet losses may be ignored (#3450)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 28 February 2020 00:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91AD3A0ACE
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:55:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id m07YDAbdBGdy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A25F3A0ACD
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:55:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1582851344;
bh=v3NsATuOeA0vxOy4b1ne3/ICrS/CMyrXo/Ih6JGyGf8=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=JYpInrWJUobJfbKykVBGniDQ9asS7HfyNhDyjhBnPRFKtcxbss2GpppIilt7bxVo9
J9fic5w0ANiVFUDRUMjIhvqtYhznBrAkNuS3ewAS3r9qcnhRK4Ugm6OHHj8l0noeL+
SvssuV6LXERkjsb2Zpd/hoPy/j0nhFCzvaJ9QYos=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK52HNLX5HHL3EKOGN54MWLZBEVBNHHCDFAESA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450/review/366101046@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet losses may be ignored
(#3450)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5e586510d2bb2_1cc73fad4a0cd9601228a8";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7NgkZk8cg8l_VLCbO4P-d-cnN4U>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:55:47 -0000
janaiyengar approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450#pullrequestreview-366101046
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Restore "Ignoring Loss of Un… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify what packet loss… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet los… ianswett