Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The QUIC-TLS draft should define anti-forgery limits for packet lengths up to 2^16 (#3701)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A64E3A0982 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qouGIrIB2ML2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588A53A097D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-c73936b.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c73936b.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.112.13]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D3E520DC6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1600997880; bh=TETSp+gqGtiA7Vt3T/tzHSkFKRODVbeey4VatIg4oW8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tWRDbwOTsZzkv+AMN5+9aslQgq2Ec5d8gS9hTdRheRiVKDMr6CXvSC+jMMZHb7Tef q1YjAoweljJBObp1teB/7ETIsU1gNsIwB8pl1LJeoPlrfb623y5HQP9PEFMESgmzR1 kLLo6SwxEzeXqJTNAc+6N8KaGlNJMHonvoKq9ThE=
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:38:00 -0700
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5UFIM4ULS434KBFB55PEVPREVBNHHCKRFAVA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3701/698672768@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3701@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3701@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The QUIC-TLS draft should define anti-forgery limits for packet lengths up to 2^16 (#3701)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f6d49f8466af_65bc19f01147256"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/D5O6z4FV-XZ6LB1SpJygMMLCEQg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:38:02 -0000

The flow chart is [here](https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/workflow.png). Closing an issue that's marked neither editorial nor design isn't a scenario that's allowed according to that diagram.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3701#issuecomment-698672768