IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)

Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com> Tue, 18 December 2018 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102BB12D4ED for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:18:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ln6UgCQl2Wik for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44880124BAA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:18:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=cw1a3A9VgHm+6Rct6VyVuReuopA=; b=WLb1s6qsERM+/IS6 gEWC5RFWYnStjn+9kzzMg5UehPlg9QetaBnmEgQEiPz+Tbab07GDScoj6ZYKNn0c 39KGDdusB1LiB/tubfHw5ohJhXSdX5zSmRPlqfr3np+dh198gHdDlb2PuGFY5pv5 au0rJiaE/EeL2gFe1qntYz0s+ow=
Received: by filter0579p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0579p1iad2-18484-5C18C98F-F 2018-12-18 10:18:55.438330687 +0000 UTC m=+57448.572918145
Received: from github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.35]) by ismtpd0039p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id eEqbJCunQGuNJno1pu2X_w for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:18:55.477 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDEA1E1407 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 02:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:18:55 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab95ca20098011682cf2e804cad65cbcaa6aa647ce92cf0000000118308b8f92a169ce174bff2c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156/448169942@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c18c98f6c3ed_65ce3fd8172d45b81155d9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Y+2gWJlt/LCGfusBe3pwvS0PaCkkTSP104O KiT/yzxm3KQw3nrhn8P6FSuFPFd+dWpx/txC1z13Vy5oohKabHWvAxlw8+On56jo4KSSHxFssHFEgt Lzr0E4iaVmTp8cJaCUqVmDLkL0YUF/lXqWacs8Px73RjxrJQI8Yh9HfoiR8TfN8itK4vmsvu4MNM6R 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Dqe1X5DOJ1hGcFdp30kWir_Jty4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:18:59 -0000

I just commented that I think SHOULD in 3) is wrong, as if one send IP packets with QUIC packets in them and have ECT set, then one MUST treat CE marks on those packets as congestion events. Otherwise one is a non responsive to congestion and unfair to other ECT flows. And it is RECOVERY's task to define that response. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156#issuecomment-448169942

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email