IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B7E127598 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:06:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VRCF-8gOzlfT for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-10.smtp.github.com (out-10.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B47A1200D7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:05:59 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545023159; bh=oX8M/UJffobcv34hOpxO+KPGopEjtxJtYxHIeWORL5c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uc9pgOHQXj/+C7/DjlRkXA7LgijkgKBcFA1T7+6p0JOBFbuMLtYsbKgzMYp/se9/4 a6L+lqHir1NfoUMKLsJCfDEvI/mQ0nhRJqu9rbGmjHxfDg9/2lFuhHPc9xLoisr5gS fwWZZ0GiOmlJlhham+5gcBNf/Fsyfux29KCG9BQc=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab116c63298b909d393d055093dd3a727ff0aa3f8992cf00000001182ef0b792a169ce174bff2c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156/447723917@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN not required (#2156)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c172eb74258e_34233fa01b0d45bc90795"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PGZNwynCfDkj5T8gvIsM8L5bVkI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:06:04 -0000

IIRC what @mirjak says aligns to what I remember as the outcome of Kista.

I think it makes sense to encourage receivers to send back ACK frames with ECN counters, because without that, a sender cannot use ECN.

Whether a sender should use ECN is a different issue, and for that I prefer not having a recommendation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2156#issuecomment-447723917

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email