Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 23 May 2019 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE43F1200E0 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miBSqfjs9Ih7 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF4E120019 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 00:35:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558596942; bh=wJfGABjsOdRAREZVC1BMV6J05PgGAfyKzYtb5uixcT4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=I5Bk8iq5luOTtcAZHLIKGMZfNqXvd/2vbPd5/bycdKCtPXfy6KIUTgHtsaihC6eER bvU8p5hp3S5rdJaPds9Fmfxh1rhKEinoKxgIMaUlnG+t2evVy9FONCUnfvmIm31Pgj rb5emmMwll9UFg+mefSPqwJr1qH1vyTy5Fp6X3BM=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2754/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce64d4e3d347_75023ff2652cd96c274993"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 07:35:45 -0000

> The proposal seems to make tree entry operations more deterministic. However, tree management like pruning and shuffling based on stream closure seems non-determinisitc. H2 has problems in this regard already.

Yeah. I think we share the view that the approach proposed will have the same pros and cons that the prioritization scheme of H2 has. I think that's a good thing, because it helps people use the same approach when using the prioritization scheme.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: