Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)

ianswett <> Tue, 11 February 2020 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B340120818 for <>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKeqEbK4vlCX for <>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5805212006F for <>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:16:00 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581455760; bh=Qky5B3vVlLqlCmq7ekPN203SCiqztYxvQX0BXT4AVUE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mwumNoA9EtOjqrSBJZVhwh91uAKB5Uqlbtf8ghDkpgxJtV0DeMEhcBypajGD6vK+S 42jaMADGbNvVS/I5ccApWbfG7vj5Otj6wY2WavWTv/rblubccuIQXVtbw9S8o+4fgu mP3qTq0k+EFbi/5SRtJThL5AkBI+bMl/M7PAGpBE=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3443/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e43199022e84_2e373fdd3b0cd96c1052bc"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:16:05 -0000

Those are great questions.  There are two goals in my mind.  The first is to ensure loss recovery is not unnecessarily slower than TCP.  The second is to ensure this behavior isn't significantly more aggressive than TCP.  But within those bounds, I'm inclined to not be too restrictive, if that makes sense?  Suggestions welcome if you think they'd be an improvement.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: