IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843B33A00AD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJotao2GFx_8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AD013A00C1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1651C0DD5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1584017470; bh=EtLL5XCgUF4VqMpPMnLibmJxC6Tp9zfWsrZ0wDAhPcw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tM36XDYc/+R6bPTA3GXTtINhtmW+F75pZx4OOkUkjjREC8/Dm6ONDzCHZWiBnJXbK FeqrSV5IoU6LGUIfCqTMv3Or+25aM+82cNwUmilYqaLt7s3XuS05pVzucCsySduA7M cJ8EziMA774ZzWnrYW2bc6j8H6z8LFiEvxTU57KM=
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:51:10 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZZXYH43KGZYR73B6F4OYIT3EVBNHHCDAQ2C4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3443/review/373525665@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3443@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3443@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e6a303e36e_6cba3fad2eecd9641037fd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SYmD6O6MRZxmhOZaEn9pP-UXe40>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:51:13 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



> @@ -706,6 +706,13 @@ The recovery period limits congestion window reduction to once per round trip.
 During recovery, the congestion window remains unchanged irrespective of new
 losses or increases in the ECN-CE counter.
 
+When entering recovery, a single packet MAY be sent even if bytes in flight

I'm not sure. It depends on what you read first. It's like that NATO test with two pages of questions and instructions, the first stating to read everything first, the last stating the all other questions need not be answered. Why gives those entries priority over other entries?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3443#discussion_r391598372

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email