Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)

ianswett <> Sun, 21 July 2019 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D996812011E for <>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTJZu3WWXVzN for <>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 06:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E457012004E for <>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 06:38:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1563716328; bh=aCvqY/At2jjtnxuQMeca9XAWPNhNH890MxGHgK2+BKI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Aw5HKQMPt3nCRSMGgYBgIN1XVBpQZW6jA/YN5JZ0KylG1rQBdI78JHv/icJc4UuZS ccL0jFtW3tODjtPh0LzLwGMtjcwcqwMzETz7edDkPYoJ1/2d67TLs1if+nuJ2Agzzw scnx+txH0/J5SbTXkKrJ2vR1Y6xEl+xFeI+VbBUE=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d346ae8cb4d1_55963f85f86cd960117752"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:38:52 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -629,6 +629,14 @@ MAY use alternate strategies for determining the content of probe packets,
 including sending new or retransmitted data based on the application's
+If the handshake is complete, but not confirmed (see Section 4.1.1 and Section

Also, now that I read the existing text again, I'm wondering if the "Sending Probe Packets" section should be before "Handshakes and New Paths"?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: