Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)

Marten Seemann <> Thu, 11 July 2019 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572B6120157 for <>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2_KMOinAN8q for <>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3F5120153 for <>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:21:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1562858492; bh=+v01rG/3WIZhyYV4jk6Z49I2jECd8cs9Fo+tOM0ziME=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fmqFMbsTzngvtAc7JzU/HJx2ofWEoBhaB+MO/bhBPMy4x7zUIeeugHBaKgXUmxLy3 +FWT1z3XE3GmRaohsmBUykcbTZCB/Lybn0WiBPciUgqsbTY+3djHwgLFTf4yE1Ia8M HX3nR1X7idWb3QPpWS398nplfP2q0T+75J3WJ3Vs=
From: Marten Seemann <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2753fce1272_34073fc9e74cd95c665862"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:21:36 -0000

> This is going to conflict with #2806 so I'll try to merge that soon.

@ianswett I don't think this is an editorial change. Furthermore, I don't believe that a change to the loss recovery algorithm is necessarily the best fix for #2863.
Can we not merge this until Montreal?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: