IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF1B120158 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FWP4kN5BKk73 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75AA12003F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=/V3Siqpdp2s3Mnwen7F6uTKSaR8=; b=KOsXHaZG8EZFTxcE f50xTt+X9rn+EdZx+AX98X4OZ/uZ/KxRGvx6aG/DKWqXzSP8AXXWGgnjPaXiAPYc dmNIW+NaQFX/g3TfWXc+t8jnWDdFRG8k4NtsofwVpdBTSSHey/yp++auxjznyQZy 4WYZ5FJVE1JqL650oeTJdqP3qDo=
Received: by filter1138p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1138p1las1-23718-5CB4546D-29 2019-04-15 09:52:45.753175446 +0000 UTC m=+551885.779365417
Received: from github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.41]) by ismtpd0007p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id lPGnHj6kSY-7ZisCX3T72A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:45.626 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3253E0438 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:45 +0000
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab36faec08b0e3714d60937c2baacc7deb7d878f8792cebac186ed92a169ce195b61e0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555/483186136@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb4546d99510_552a3fe6486d45c0536e6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1hJMPKCVL1MM1tBRkCSkCPo5wsB3lIFhySlr Atc1OlXN5v5AZbROWB3HDCiZpBSsDGjHWCSGjZL7J/0BCGiji50Qrd7IUNqEHAz2qqKTaXWH9hUmTc s7NLve7fWf0ISoXM6zeKjQsLwcVkOH06n/0NnoVpyfm/euN0JV8QdRD0Ew==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/JBM25vJD-RnveiryBJAfxmNPtv8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:49 -0000

Given that I think that the general guidance for QUIC is "use pacing", I think a "MUST reset to IW if not paced" is actually the right thing to do to support that pacing gets implemented with QUIC from the start. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555#issuecomment-483186136

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email