Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix language around CC on migration (#2918)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Mon, 12 August 2019 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B114C12010D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fe0Se0j3IKfc for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1595120D9E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:34:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1565645670; bh=97FP250l/ytwa3qIUBFIdErPayhy4l5dlHiVwGQlhKY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2Ft5Pt+2cj7zzkzKy/4AGvrmsfUvnapV8tAaFnGDcz+Y70J2eJBIdD9Z7ZvS/4Gd3 N0XKWe8hOpv7nSZxcMh3j+YpQXTlni27Y0osX4KHmlKoUr5UoIBlp+x1fhmrEWdU1E /tDK14xehwKm43f/zYOuaxWm/H0gIicnIHpELBcE=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6JSRBZB2IRMQ5FR3F3L4G6NEVBNHHBYEARTM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2918/review/273963454@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2918@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2918@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix language around CC on migration (#2918)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d51db66d90f3_3103fa9a0acd9688021b0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Nh0vVFBpe3LKm6O9Wd0i7OtrzdA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:45:59 -0000

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



>  immediately reset the congestion controller and round-trip time estimator for
-the new path to initial values (see Sections A.3 and B.3 in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}).
-
-An endpoint MUST NOT return to the send rate used for the previous path unless
-it is reasonably sure that the previous send rate is valid for the new path.
-For instance, a change in the client's port number is likely indicative of a
-rebinding in a middlebox and not a complete change in path.  This determination
-likely depends on heuristics, which could be imperfect; if the new path capacity
-is significantly reduced, ultimately this relies on the congestion controller
-responding to congestion signals and reducing send rates appropriately.
+the new path to initial values (see Sections A.3 and B.3 in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}})
+unless it has knowledge that a previous send rate or round-trip time estimate
+is valid for the new path.  For instance, an endpoint might infer that a change
+in only the client's port number is likely indicative of a NAT rebinding,
+meaning that the new path is likely to have similar bandwidth and round-trip
+time. This determination is likely to be imperfect.  If

Thanks for the editorializing, @tfpauly - incorporated.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2918#discussion_r313138864