Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)
Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 02:15 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC30112011F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:15:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frwCtVTmsA8i for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E6E120048 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-f62aa54.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f62aa54.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DB6520C23 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:15:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574043301; bh=UVmL93XpYeJBYBP1Nr70ukIufSp/mhxqQ4TBY+0Ja9o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iZxHuWjm9P1RMLb1H7viTLjJhSpEphdSERiO9xW2KZ3pqWWS2feBUd5QPJmLhh/9g /cpba+LpjYspHBJtMndgwey/X+Skew/QmfjOt8lHh704qlvrurAZuIdkQ5Tov0obWo DDDFFQNsV2ddawJ/e0fQO/RTed3lFzPiI80XQeqw=
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:15:01 -0800
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZIDWFUPR4GNC472FN334YSLEVBNHHB6OUW5E@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244/554821548@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd1fea556a10_41d43feab54cd968117894"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QZxYvTTn4j6sPg87p7q__HmbaE8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:15:03 -0000
Yes, this comment targets recovery. I think the editors can propose text referring to the draft - there is no intended change to the technical spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244#issuecomment-554821548
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref … Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative … Jana Iyengar