Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handshake loss recovery interacts poorly with amplification attack defense (#1764)

Martin Thomson <> Sun, 23 September 2018 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58916130DE3 for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 09:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VThnmKK_AEj5 for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A977E12F1A6 for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 09:23:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1537719832; bh=IFNlPLAp7raQo1WpYHQNlOAHj3b4n7i7aVa1HT7t7Es=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GlJBi2YAWg/yba6LJRWlWxmIGLvOe6mdsmUQ/FWEuPPuWuFTU3pRH68Haus/BOhFJ zIUK82NG7IRKuLh9JG8Hb5pJVqEzVYlHhcKu3s8jZk91RIXp3AdrHkj0S/qTvYDeMt PDXsj03gGx1/D4Eksetd4gF188URH0JMkFwCY/n0=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1764/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handshake loss recovery interacts poorly with amplification attack defense (#1764)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ba7be189b69c_5baf3fe354ad45b81457d1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 16:23:55 -0000

We can fix the byte-counting vs. packet-counting thing at the same time.

The datagram thing was OK if you assumed that the inbound datagrams were full-sized, but that assumption no longer holds.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: