[quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recovery of delayed ack being 25ms does not seem to relate to anything (#3075)

Johannes Rudolph <notifications@github.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317ED120849 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGnGKyf-HGOo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A386612085C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F336A1C0E2B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:00:21 -0700
From: Johannes Rudolph <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4DZBSEWWGBRK4NP3F3UOYALEVBNHHB34GMIM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recovery of delayed ack being 25ms does not seem to relate to anything (#3075)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d966f75e41cc_49003ffbe44cd96419818d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: jrudolph
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/UiMBvzfOBbfKkTB7Isk3PMxheQ8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 22:00:24 -0000

This paragraph didn't seem to relate to anything else in the document:

> A shorter delayed ack time of 25ms was chosen because longer delayed acks can delay loss recovery and for the small number of connections where less than packet per 25ms is delivered, acking every packet is beneficial to congestion control and loss recovery.

Is it left-over from a previous version?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075