Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 April 2020 02:44 UTC

Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:11 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7H4GMMV3IV5OAI5GF4VDWXXEVBNHHCFCMR3U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512/616278624@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e9d0c7b988e_7bc23fe95bacd96891474b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WnzM6qL9_n25hu3bfufQyZmXVnU>

I think that we can take this as editorial, as it merely requires that we capture already agreed principles (we don't protect against an adversary who can inject packets).  @erickinnear's assistance would be useful, but I can produce text if nothing is forthcoming.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512#issuecomment-616278624

[quicwg/base-drafts] Thread model discussion does… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … Lucas Pardue
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … Eric Kinnear
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … Lucas Pardue
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion … Martin Thomson