Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 20 April 2020 02:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578A63A0CF3 for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3z1FPyqg4Gu for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4033A0CF2 for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E84520B7C for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1587350651; bh=10YeSlPrzxMsrEthfOYMSm97pghxoyFqueE+Nh0Jcrc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bad/eCWwULkJJje3mqCI/d54mQT7x9yJIjM4WZclSSE+pySfrsobKu5TTHD94LzYc Jcvq+ExTRmfNJjCqbN+2O64xiGd71RVOGa0t9nAn6qiuwzDJSTK2g5CM/oek62iWx2 6fQMjHJdY9Ids+YUzXDaVYW6Yfx5y7vmp4LdJQMU=
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:44:11 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e9d0c7b988e_7bc23fe95bacd96891474b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:44:13 -0000

I think that we can take this as editorial, as it merely requires that we capture already agreed principles (we don't protect against an adversary who can inject packets).  @erickinnear's assistance would be useful, but I can produce text if nothing is forthcoming.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: